This article refers to the P.S.1 exhibition YAP 10th Anniversary Review
SHoP won the 2000 YAP with Dunescape, a design that set the precedent for the “urban beach.”
P.S.1: How was the project described to you?
Gregg Pasquarelli, SHoP Architects: At the time when we were first nominated, we didn’t know anything about YAP. Terry Riley called the office and said, “You should really do this.” We went to P.S.1 to meet with staff and they described what they had done for the two previous years, showing us pictures of Gelitin’s project and Phillip Johnson’s installation. Their biggest issue was that they wanted it to be an urban beach but with more shade. The first questions we asked ourselves were, “Do you need water and sand to make a beach?” We had been experimenting with digital simulation and animation design techniques as well as really trying to push this idea of “performance-based design,” but SHoP’s main interest was translating the digital into the actual. How could an architect extract what was so provocative on the screen and retain this once it’s built? How do you do that on a limited budget without making it look like a school project? We had to make that translation in six weeks! Back then the competition didn’t seem like a big deal. For us it was more, “Let’s see if we can test these ideas out.”
P.S.1: Wow, you had such a relaxed attitude!
SHoP: We never knew it would turn into something so big! We were definitely challenged by Alanna Heiss and Terry Riley who both perceived this as a big thing. We really wanted it to be great. SHoP believes the more theoretical the design, or the more you want to push the theoretical envelope, the more you have to know how to actually do it. It is kind of an equal and opposite action to balance the technological with the artistic. I remember the day Dunescape was finished. Terry said to us, “I’m so proud you set the bar so high because now this is going to be taken seriously by the architectural community.” At the time we didn’t really understand what he was saying. You have to remember we were barely 30 years old! It took about three or four years for us to really understand what he was talking about that day. He had a lot of vision when it came to the program. In retrospect the idea was totally half baked and we didn’t really know it! It was both the speed and the freedom of YAP that made it an interesting and potent mix for us. It gave us a lot of confidence in the ensuing years to take on larger and more difficult projects. YAP does an amazing job of identifying interesting people early in their careers. I believe that’s the great success of the program—keeping it firmly in the experimental zone and finding talent early. Ultimately that means some installations are more successful than others but that’s okay. I’ve heard, “I don’t really like the YAP project this year. It’s not very good.” We think, “So what? That’s not what it’s about.”
P.S.1: And your role as a young architect....
SHoP: Well, I guess we’re not young anymore but maybe you can say we’re still young-ish! We still have the same attitude of “Sure, we’re not afraid to try and design something theoretical and stand behind it and get it built.” We don’t always know what we’re doing, but we’ll figure it out. I believe that we’re still learning and still challenging ourselves daily, so if you think about it, we’re really not that much different from our P.S.1 days.
This interview was conducted by Chris Barley and Troy Conrad Therrien, recent graduates of the Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation at Columbia University. As students they collected an image archive and condicuted an oral history project on YAP for a seminar with Barry Bergdoll, the Philip Johnson Chief Curator of Architecture and Design at MoMA. They were asked to collaborate with P.S.1 to commemorate the 10th anniversary of the program by organizing an exhibition of the images collected and offering their oral histories to be edited and published in the Summer 2009 P.S.1 Newspaper. They will continue this research as part of their on-going project, "Youth Value", on youth in architecture.
A History of YAP: If These Walls Could Talk
Ellinger/Yehia Design: Making it Real
nArchitects: Walking in a Bamboo Wonderland
Q&A with Young Architects: MOS 2009
Gage/Clemenceau Architects: The Golden Rule
Cho Slade: Falling from the Skies
Q&A with Young Architects: Gnuform 2006
Q&A with Young Architects: KDLAB 2002
Q&A with Young Architects: L.E.FT 2009
Q&A with the YAP Jury: Barry Bergdoll
Q&A with the YAP Jury: Terence Riley
Q&A with the YAP Jury: Antoine Guerrero
Q&A with the YAP Jury: Andres Lepik
Q&A with the YAP Jury: Klaus Biesenbach
Q&A with the YAP Jury: Peter Reed
Q&A with Young Architects: MONAD 2008
Q&A with Young Architects: LOT-EK 2000
Q&A with Young Architects: SYSTEMArchitects 2001/2003
THEM (Lynch + Crembil): Building a Structure, Building a Network
Q&A with Young Architects: IWAMOTOSCOTT 2006
Q&A with Young Architects: Studio SUMO 2001
Q&A with Young Architects: Taeg Nishimoto 2000
Matter Practice: Earthly Delights
PARA-Project: Excess as a Resource
Q&A with Young Architects: !ndie Architecture 2009
Q&A with Young Architects: Griffin Enright Architects 2004
Q&A with Young Architects: su11 architecture+design 2008
Forsythe + MacAllen Design / molo: Winning Isn't Everything
Material Lab: Changing Conditions
Bade Stageberg Cox: Beyond the Usual Approach