P.S.1 Newspaper

2009 Fall

Q&A with Young Architects: KDLAB 2002

This article refers to the P.S.1 exhibition YAP 10th Anniversary Review

In celebration of YAP’s tenth anniversary, P.S.1 newspaper reached to the nearly fifty participating firms to share their experiences as both finalists and winners.

KDLAB was a finalist in the 2002 edition of YAP. The firm is no longer in operation as both partners have moved on to other ventures—Dean di Simone is now the principal of TENDER and Joseph Kosinski is a director in Hollywood.

Question 1: How did you position yourself to get nominated?

Dean di Simone, TENDER: Coming out of the Graduate School of Architecture at Columbia, my partner and I were interested in finding ways to incorporate various forms of media into an architectural context. As such, we were experimenting with a series of 3D, animation, and interactive software packages to simulate built space. The results were a series of short-films and interactive installations that garnered attention everywhere from architectural periodicals to film festivals, all championing not only the narrative component but also the architecture that housed each of the pieces.

Question 2: Did YAP change anything for you or your firm? When did you recognize the full potential of the competition?

YAP allowed us to consider what it means to design a multi-sensory experience through various formal and programmatic means. P.S.1’s summer WarmUp provided the unique challenge of framing an event that included sound, water, shade, socializing, meditation, commerce, and art, and previewed what would ultimately manifest as a strength in our practice—the synthesizing of experiential components to brand-build for our clients. Since our entry, my partner and I have successfully used the experience to launch into respectively successful careers in brand strategy and film direction.

Question 3: How was your design shaped by the history of YAP?

The history of YAP was brief when we were selected, but we were fortunate to have seen SHoP successfully build a program that was appropriated in unimaginable ways during its tenure. It was through this fantastic framing of the context of WarmUp that we learned how much more architecture and design had to offer than what may be initially perceived in a series of visuals and drawings.

 

 
also in this issue:

A History of YAP: If These Walls Could Talk

Ellinger/Yehia Design: Making it Real

nArchitects: Walking in a Bamboo Wonderland

Q&A with Young Architects: MOS 2009

Gage/Clemenceau Architects: The Golden Rule

Roy: Showing Her Best Moves

Cho Slade: Falling from the Skies

SHoP: Lost in Translation

Q&A with Young Architects: Gnuform 2006

Q&A with Young Architects: KDLAB 2002

Q&A with Young Architects: L.E.FT 2009

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Barry Bergdoll

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Terence Riley

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Antoine Guerrero

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Andres Lepik

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Klaus Biesenbach

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Peter Reed

Q&A with Young Architects: MONAD 2008

Q&A with Young Architects: LOT-EK 2000

Q&A with Young Architects: SYSTEMArchitects 2001/2003

WW: Spiral Settee

THEM (Lynch + Crembil): Building a Structure, Building a Network

Graftworks: Hothouse Lily

Q&A with Young Architects: IWAMOTOSCOTT 2006

Q&A with Young Architects: Studio SUMO 2001

Q&A with Young Architects: Taeg Nishimoto 2000

Matter Practice: Earthly Delights

Aranda \ Lasch: Urban Cave

OBRA: Beatfuse!

PARA-Project: Excess as a Resource

Q&A with Young Architects: !ndie Architecture 2009

Q&A with Young Architects: Griffin Enright Architects 2004

Q&A with Young Architects: su11 architecture+design 2008

Forsythe + MacAllen Design / molo: Winning Isn't Everything

Material Lab: Changing Conditions

Bade Stageberg Cox: Beyond the Usual Approach

Spotlight On Carlos Motta

Q&A with Young Architects: Ball-Nogues

Q&A with Young Architects: 2003 Tom Wiscombe