P.S.1 Newspaper

2009 Fall

THEM (Lynch + Crembil): Building a Structure, Building a Network

This article refers to the P.S.1 exhibition YAP 10th Anniversary Review

THEM (Lynch + Crembil) competed in 2008 with an entry that focused on globalization and development. Architects Peter Lynch and Gustavo Grembil looked to Crembil’s native country of Argentina to help put together a project that required extensive weaving.

P.S.1: We were wondering how you understood the project’s brief. Most people say it’s very simple. What was your approach?

Peter Lynch and Gustavo Crembil, THEM (Lynch + Crembil): What we ended up doing was what we always do and to be honest, that’s sort of a gamble. You just let the cards fall. In the end we did a very material, very logistical, and very process- intensive proposal. Like most firms, we didn’t merely look at the words in brief but really tried to understand what was behind those words. It’s not very complex: it’s a dance space; you need shade, you need water, a place for bars. But we thought that there was an end-game aspect to what the competition is doing. They’ve been doing this gig so long that we figured they needed some way to transform their own brief, even if it was unspoken. Sure enough, that is what happened with the team that won our year, WORKac!

P.S.1: But you’ve been involved in YAP twice! How did your proposal differ the second time?

THEM: When we put together the second project for P.S.1 and MoMA, we decided to go backwards instead forwards, reinventing things we had explored before. A “let’s see what we already have” approach. Besides the design, we offered a network that we’d built—we were a big team. We worked with a community of weavers in Argentina. Starting from their basic skill set, we went towards changing the way they were working by introducing new techniques and connecting them with other producers. The weavers had never worked on a common project and for YAP, they needed to work together, weaving side-by-side. We were stumbling together. The group wasn’t exclusively weavers. We worked with cartoneros, people who collect recycled materials, on developing what was almost a leadership, managerial cadre within these communities. They stripped the bottles and the weavers did tests on weaving them. Working with people from Argentina, you gamble with more than just time; you wager good will. You can’t make promises or give hedged representations to people who need work without expecting repercussions. Even though we tried to be clear that this was a competition and that it wasn’t a sure thing, it was a bummer for them.

P.S.1: How were you able to present this global network? Was there more to it?

THEM: There was also something of the history of architecture in our presentation. The idea of the pleasure dome—after all, the first man-made landscape was a pleasure garden—is the idea that within the city you can go somewhere to forget about the city, to imagine paradise. That was the spirit we were trying to evoke. There are still beer gardens in Queens; you see this in Berlin and Munich. It’s the idea that in summer you hang out at twilight, under the trees with your beer. We had these lightweight interlocking soil-cement blocks that people could use to build whatever they wanted: you’re hanging out for a couple of hours— build yourself a house! That was the idea.

P.S.1: Where’d you get that idea?

THEM: Many years ago, on the West Side, there was an abandoned pier that was paved in asphalt bricks. I went there one Sunday morning and a community of homeless people was building houses out of these little bricks. They had built themselves a city within a city: it was phenomenal! The police have destroyed it all now but it was this idea, this spontaneous thing. The root of our P.S.1 entry was the myth of the origin of architecture: where do buildings come from?

 

This interview was conducted by Chris Barley and Troy Conrad Therrien, recent graduates of the Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation at Columbia University. As students they collected an image archive and condicuted an oral history project on YAP for a seminar with Barry Bergdoll, the Philip Johnson Chief Curator of Architecture and Design at MoMA. They were asked to collaborate with P.S.1 to commemorate the 10th anniversary of the program by organizing an exhibition of the images collected and offering their oral histories to be edited and published in the Summer 2009 P.S.1 Newspaper. They will continue this research as part of their on-going project, "Youth Value", on youth in architecture.

 
also in this issue:

A History of YAP: If These Walls Could Talk

Ellinger/Yehia Design: Making it Real

nArchitects: Walking in a Bamboo Wonderland

Q&A with Young Architects: MOS 2009

Gage/Clemenceau Architects: The Golden Rule

Roy: Showing Her Best Moves

Cho Slade: Falling from the Skies

SHoP: Lost in Translation

Q&A with Young Architects: Gnuform 2006

Q&A with Young Architects: KDLAB 2002

Q&A with Young Architects: L.E.FT 2009

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Barry Bergdoll

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Terence Riley

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Antoine Guerrero

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Andres Lepik

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Klaus Biesenbach

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Peter Reed

Q&A with Young Architects: MONAD 2008

Q&A with Young Architects: LOT-EK 2000

Q&A with Young Architects: SYSTEMArchitects 2001/2003

WW: Spiral Settee

THEM (Lynch + Crembil): Building a Structure, Building a Network

Graftworks: Hothouse Lily

Q&A with Young Architects: IWAMOTOSCOTT 2006

Q&A with Young Architects: Studio SUMO 2001

Q&A with Young Architects: Taeg Nishimoto 2000

Matter Practice: Earthly Delights

Aranda \ Lasch: Urban Cave

OBRA: Beatfuse!

PARA-Project: Excess as a Resource

Q&A with Young Architects: !ndie Architecture 2009

Q&A with Young Architects: Griffin Enright Architects 2004

Q&A with Young Architects: su11 architecture+design 2008

Forsythe + MacAllen Design / molo: Winning Isn't Everything

Material Lab: Changing Conditions

Bade Stageberg Cox: Beyond the Usual Approach

Spotlight On Carlos Motta

Q&A with Young Architects: Ball-Nogues

Q&A with Young Architects: 2003 Tom Wiscombe