P.S.1 Newspaper

2009 Fall

Graftworks: Hothouse Lily

This article refers to the P.S.1 exhibition YAP 10th Anniversary Review

Lawrence Blough founded GRAFTWORKS, an interdisciplinary design practice in 1999. His 2005 finals entry was a botanical blossom that would literally bloom right in the P.S.1 courtyard.

P.S.1: What was the thought behind your project?

Lawrence Blough, GRAFTWORKS: Basically we tried to develop a construction system that was flexible—it could be adaptable to different conditions and would really deal with the economies of construction. It also had to be built using unskilled labor so we wanted to develop a series of CNC milled parts that incorporate coded instructions for assembly. The topic for the competition as presented to us by Terry Riley was the “urban beach.” It seemed interesting to look at botanical analogues because it could tie into the topic and take on the provocation of naturalized technology. The genealogy goes back to Paxton in the late nineteenth century, where he had studied botanical models to develop greenhouse structures that used prefabrication. I also hoped that this research could lead to a novel tectonic system which is a preoccupation of my practice and teaching. We ended up focusing on the water lily and we tried to unlock what its traits were. There is an amazing lattice system of ribs that supports the pad, allows it to float and makes it very strong. It also goes through a series of transformations as it moves from the bottom of the water to the surface. We extracted these concepts and developed a lattice that performed many things at once by creating a set of a prefab profiles that could be tailored for different conditions in the site and create a variety of spatial experiences. When we presented the project, the committee was very excited by it but they thought it was too concentrated. They asked, “Would you be interested in doing more of it?” but I was really concerned about it hitting budget. In retrospect, it should have covered a larger field. Glenn Lowry said, “It’s the water lily—let’s grow more of it!” We could’ve increased it by 20-30% to get more of a canopy. Every scheme that has won covers the entire courtyard. This is the psychology of architecture: how important is it that you win? It was great just to be included. But at that point, do you see it as a culmination of your work to date or is it a projection of where you would like to go and a stepping stone for your career? How do people think of it? I’ve seen people take things that they’ve already done and riff on it. I saw the competition as an opportunity to try something new that we hadn’t done in the office.

P.S.1: In the end, your project was built, which is fantastic!

GW: A year or two ago, a friend of mine who is an artist and curator in Miami contacted me. She had come to the office to see my P.S.1 scheme and was really excited about it and she asked, “Would you be interested in creating this for a gallery show?” I never thought it was going to happen so I happily agreed. We ultimately fabricated the scheme last spring. It’s great that we stayed on this thing and got it built.

 

This interview was conducted by Chris Barley and Troy Conrad Therrien, recent graduates of the Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation at Columbia University. As students they collected an image archive and condicuted an oral history project on YAP for a seminar with Barry Bergdoll, the Philip Johnson Chief Curator of Architecture and Design at MoMA. They were asked to collaborate with P.S.1 to commemorate the 10th anniversary of the program by organizing an exhibition of the images collected and offering their oral histories to be edited and published in the Summer 2009 P.S.1 Newspaper. They will continue this research as part of their on-going project, "Youth Value", on youth in architecture.

 
also in this issue:

A History of YAP: If These Walls Could Talk

Ellinger/Yehia Design: Making it Real

nArchitects: Walking in a Bamboo Wonderland

Q&A with Young Architects: MOS 2009

Gage/Clemenceau Architects: The Golden Rule

Roy: Showing Her Best Moves

Cho Slade: Falling from the Skies

SHoP: Lost in Translation

Q&A with Young Architects: Gnuform 2006

Q&A with Young Architects: KDLAB 2002

Q&A with Young Architects: L.E.FT 2009

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Barry Bergdoll

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Terence Riley

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Antoine Guerrero

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Andres Lepik

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Klaus Biesenbach

Q&A with the YAP Jury: Peter Reed

Q&A with Young Architects: MONAD 2008

Q&A with Young Architects: LOT-EK 2000

Q&A with Young Architects: SYSTEMArchitects 2001/2003

WW: Spiral Settee

THEM (Lynch + Crembil): Building a Structure, Building a Network

Graftworks: Hothouse Lily

Q&A with Young Architects: IWAMOTOSCOTT 2006

Q&A with Young Architects: Studio SUMO 2001

Q&A with Young Architects: Taeg Nishimoto 2000

Matter Practice: Earthly Delights

Aranda \ Lasch: Urban Cave

OBRA: Beatfuse!

PARA-Project: Excess as a Resource

Q&A with Young Architects: !ndie Architecture 2009

Q&A with Young Architects: Griffin Enright Architects 2004

Q&A with Young Architects: su11 architecture+design 2008

Forsythe + MacAllen Design / molo: Winning Isn't Everything

Material Lab: Changing Conditions

Bade Stageberg Cox: Beyond the Usual Approach

Spotlight On Carlos Motta

Q&A with Young Architects: Ball-Nogues

Q&A with Young Architects: 2003 Tom Wiscombe