This article refers to the P.S.1 exhibition YAP 10th Anniversary Review
In celebration of YAP’s tenth anniversary, P.S.1 newspaper reached out to the nearly fifty participating firms to share their experiences as both finalists and winners.
!ndie Architecture, founded by Paul Andersen in Denver, Colorado, was chosen as a finalist in the 2009 edition of YAP with Lawn Life, an elaborate turf lawn that focused as much on the social tradition of urban parks as on suburban backyards.
Question 1: How did you position yourself to get nominated?
Paul Andersen, !ndie Architecture: I’m a visiting critic at Harvard and Mohsen Mostafavi, Dean of the Graduate School of Design, nominated me.
Question 2: Did YAP change anything for you or your firm? When did you recognize the full potential of the competition?
The potential of the competition was obvious very early: it was possible to combine several of the office’s primary interests—developing new models for suburban development, linking material customization to thermal control, etc. As to how it will affect the firm’s trajectory, it’s too early to tell.
Question 3: How was your design shaped by the history of YAP?
We responded to the program’s history by advocating two swerves. First we went with a ground-based scheme. Nearly every previous proposal we could find was predominantly, if not totally, a canopy. While there are advantages to leaving the surface of the courtyard clear, there are benefits to designing it too. People have more opportunities for physical-sensory interaction with the installation, there are fewer structural complications, there are a variety of ways to compartmentalize space, and different components, such as pools, furniture, and shading devices, can be highly integrated. The other way we broke with tradition was to introduce a suburban vibe. P.S.1 has a strong legacy of beach resort landscapes, a few urban ones, and even a farm—but never anything suburban. Because suburbia has been the source of so many fantasies and problems, we think there is a lot of potential for invention.
A History of YAP: If These Walls Could Talk
Ellinger/Yehia Design: Making it Real
nArchitects: Walking in a Bamboo Wonderland
Q&A with Young Architects: MOS 2009
Gage/Clemenceau Architects: The Golden Rule
Cho Slade: Falling from the Skies
Q&A with Young Architects: Gnuform 2006
Q&A with Young Architects: KDLAB 2002
Q&A with Young Architects: L.E.FT 2009
Q&A with the YAP Jury: Barry Bergdoll
Q&A with the YAP Jury: Terence Riley
Q&A with the YAP Jury: Antoine Guerrero
Q&A with the YAP Jury: Andres Lepik
Q&A with the YAP Jury: Klaus Biesenbach
Q&A with the YAP Jury: Peter Reed
Q&A with Young Architects: MONAD 2008
Q&A with Young Architects: LOT-EK 2000
Q&A with Young Architects: SYSTEMArchitects 2001/2003
THEM (Lynch + Crembil): Building a Structure, Building a Network
Q&A with Young Architects: IWAMOTOSCOTT 2006
Q&A with Young Architects: Studio SUMO 2001
Q&A with Young Architects: Taeg Nishimoto 2000
Matter Practice: Earthly Delights
PARA-Project: Excess as a Resource
Q&A with Young Architects: !ndie Architecture 2009
Q&A with Young Architects: Griffin Enright Architects 2004
Q&A with Young Architects: su11 architecture+design 2008
Forsythe + MacAllen Design / molo: Winning Isn't Everything
Material Lab: Changing Conditions
Bade Stageberg Cox: Beyond the Usual Approach